| Author |
RE: new hashcracking idea |
S1L3NTKn1GhT
Member
Posts: 468
Location: XXXX
Joined: 03.06.06
Rank: God
Warn Level: 10
|
|
Keep your money! Im gonna pwn you!  ( J/K )
root@wtf.org#su - dumbass
Dude you're AWESOME!
-SystemMeltdown(MSN)
|
 
|
| Author |
RE: new hashcracking idea |
spyware
Member
Posts: 4151
Location: The Netherlands
Joined: 14.04.07
Rank: God
Warn Level: 90
|
|
The idea of using Google's indexing service as rainbow table was expressed once on sla.ckers.org. I however, would never trust a third-party client with such data. Especially not Google.
The most censored HBH profile.
"The chowner of property." - Zeph“Widespread intellectual and moral docility may be convenient for leaders in the short term,
but it is suicidal for nations in the long term.” - Carl Sagan “Since the grid is inescapable, what were the earlier lasers about? Does the corridor have a sense of humor?” - Ebert |
|
|
| Author |
RE: new hashcracking idea |
spyware
Member
Posts: 4151
Location: The Netherlands
Joined: 14.04.07
Rank: God
Warn Level: 90
|
|
|
jelmer wrote:
its not sensitive data or something, it are just boring hashes, i don't see a way how google could abuse this.
It's not the abuse that you should be worried about. It's a trivial task for google to stop indexing large collections of MD5 hashes, or stop people from searching for a hash.
The most censored HBH profile.
"The chowner of property." - Zeph“Widespread intellectual and moral docility may be convenient for leaders in the short term,
but it is suicidal for nations in the long term.” - Carl Sagan “Since the grid is inescapable, what were the earlier lasers about? Does the corridor have a sense of humor?” - Ebert |
|
|
| Author |
RE: new hashcracking idea |
Futility
Member
Posts: 713
Location: USA
Joined: 17.12.07
Rank: God |
|
|
jelmer wrote:
I dont think google is really caring, i heard rumours that google made their own algorithm, if it is really out there somewhere they wont really care i think.
Really?
|
 
|
| Author |
RE: new hashcracking idea |
serendipity
Member
Posts: 3
Location:
Joined: 18.06.09
Rank: Apprentice |
|
I think its a pretty cool idea. If you have a hash just enter it in google and you'll find what it is.
A couple of question though.
1) How would you store the list of hashes?
2) Up to how many hashes are you going to store on there?
3) Wouldn't take a long time and probably more memory than is economically possible (unless you have money to afford storage and bandwidth)?
I'm not trying to be a smart ass or anything I'm just wondering how you would achieve this. |
|
|
Main:
